An SBA for Nonprofits?

An SBA for Nonprofits?

By Stanley Carlson-Thies

Provided by the Institutional Religious Freedom Alliance

Congresswoman Betty McCollum has proposed the "Nonprofit Sector and Community Solutions Act,” HR 5533, to boost the federal government’s understanding of and support for nonprofit organizations. Some have likened her plan to a "Small Business Administration for Nonprofits” and laud an enlarged federal role. However, others are worried about additional burdens on nonprofits and about the bill’s apparent lack of interest in the special characteristics and needs of faith-based nonprofits.

The proposed bill would create a new advisory council mainly of experts and a new interagency working group of federal officials. These new groups would consider how the federal government can better work with nonprofits, such as ideas for streamlining the federal grants process, expanding federal initiatives to build the capacity of nonprofit organizations, improving the government’s relationships with organizations it partners with to provide services, and expanding funding for those partners. The federal government would fund more research on the sector.

Is the bill a good idea? Diana Aviv, head of the Independent Sector, the lobby for large, mainly secular, nonprofits, says, "To be even more effective, nonprofits need to be able to utilize government resources much in the way business does.” Given how vital nonprofit organizations are in so many sectors of our nation’s life, and how extensive a role they play in delivering government-funded services, knowing more about what they do and how they do it, and devising better ways for the government to interact with them and support them, seems all to the good.

Yet the government’s helping hand can be less than helpful. While the bill is well-intentioned, it has also drawn criticism. Several commentators have noted that it contemplates a big increase in the data gathered from nonprofits—as if the IRS had not already recently began gathering much new data and as if much of the data already flowing into government apparently is simply ignored. The Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability points out that, as it stands, the bill does not include an exemption for churches and church-related entities, although many of these currently are exempt from filing the 990 form with the IRS.

And, except for one brief mention, the bill ignores the federal government’s existing mechanism to improve its support for the nonprofit sector: the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships and its counterpart Centers in a dozen federal departments and agencies. (Ironically, some of the ideas in this bill were recommended by the Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships—but there the stress was on including faith-based and grassroots organizations.)

While the bill rightly notes that nonprofits benefit our society by their work in "religion, faith, and spirituality” as well as in providing health, educational, cultural, and other services, it is strikingly silent on the reality that many of the nonprofits in every area of service are themselves faith-based with an identity and practices that differ from their secular counterparts and that require special protection by government. Sarah Seitz of the Congressional Prayer Caucus notes that the original "Community Solutions Act,” HR 7, introduced in 2001, was specifically designed to protect the ability of faith-based organizations to participate in federally funded programs without suppressing their religious identity, by extending Charitable Choice rules to a wide range of federal programs. But Congresswoman McCollum, author of the current bill with a similar name, was against that measure because of Charitable Choice.

One blogger said this about Congresswoman McCollum’s bill: "The nonprofit sector is enormously diverse. It is difficult to see how this proposal will lead to a more vibrant nonprofit community as a whole. Rather, it seems directed primarily at entrenching the relationship between the federal government and large nonprofit organizations.” Make that: "large secular nonprofit organizations.”

###

Stanley Carlson-Thies, founder and president of the Institutional Religious Freedom Alliance, has worked since the early 1990s on public policy affecting faith-based organizations. He was a founding member of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives in 2001.To learn more visit www.irfalliance.org

Sign In
Login with LinkedIn
OR